In a post on Bleeding Heart Libertarians, property right were discussed in the context of being a ‘collection of rights’. In demonstrating this, they used the example of a cat. How you can own a cat, but not destroy it?
My question is that if you can’t destroy the cat (which I agree with – don’t hurt cats!), then do you really own it, or do you only maintain a sort of custodial right over it (i.e. the right to take care of it while it can’t take care of itself)?
At the end I use this logic to argue for a free market in child adoption.
This post was written by Alex Merced.
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
Latest posts by Alex Merced (see all)
- Interview with Alicia Dearn former Libertarian Party VP candidate - June 6, 2016
- Ask Alex Merced: Minimum Wage and Government Budgets - May 11, 2016
- Ask Alex Merced: Minimum Wage - April 2, 2016