Freedom Philosophy – First Things

By
Brandon Kirby
-
2
97
Being-Libertarian-Freedom-Philosophy

Archimedes, in order that he might draw the terrestrial globe out of its place, and transport it elsewhere, demanded only that one point should be fixed and immoveable; in the same way I shall have the right to conceive high hopes if I am happy enough to discover one thing only which is certain and indubitable. – Rene Descartes

In logic, we must begin with certain premises and then argue from there. Philosophers will claim that:

1) If P implies Q

2) And it is the case that P

Therefore Q

We begin with axioms, from which we derive a series of conclusions, giving us a system – a framework – with which to view the world.

Austrian economists argue that we need only to ensure our premises are true and our reasoning logical in order to have truthful economics. Other economists argue that we need to test our conclusions and make predictions of economic data. In any event, we have to begin with true premises.

All good philosophy, religion, and science begin with humility. This was Socrates’ most valuable contribution to human thought. We must have the capacity to admit we have erred in our behavior, thinking, or judgments in order to learn or have any hope of moral reform.

Socrates claims the wise person is the one who knows they are not wise. When the Pharisee and the tax collector prayed, the Pharisee thanked God for his virtue and the tax collector asked God to have mercy on him – a sinner. Christ declared the tax collector to be virtuous because he recognized his place in the universe.

The scientist begins their enterprise with the idea they must attempt to falsify their own theory. Philosophy, religion, and science that teach prideful practice (that teach an unwillingness to admit error) are bad religion, philosophy, and science.

I see no reason to avoid beginning with humility in our political project as well. It ought to begin with the confession of our ignorance.

We don’t know the best course of action for government intervention. This confession becomes prescriptive, if you see a doctor covering a poor soul in leeches you know they are taking the wrong course of action and must advise them to stop.

Stage one (for the political enterprise that begins with humility) is that ignorance implies an “ought” of inaction; inaction entails that individual liberties ought to be respected.

Via “Lockean” reasoning, this respect must carry through to respecting individual’s actions, and therefore their labour, and therefore their property.

The non-aggression principle is the corollary of liberty as a value, which stems from humility. Humility is the guiding principle that illuminates all that is good. Pride is the clouding principle that clouds it out. It isn’t the end, just as humility isn’t the end of philosophy, religion, or science either, but it is the beginning.

Descartes searched for a fixed point to construct his philosophy. He did the same in mathematics, giving us the Cartesian system by which we draw basic graphs today.

Our fixed point is our lack of greatness – our unwillingness to transgress under the false pretense of a greater good. Therein lies the heart of the liberty movement.

The following two tabs change content below.

Brandon Kirby

Brandon Kirby has a philosophy degree from the University of New Brunswick and is a current MBA candidate finishing his thesis. He is an AML officer specializing in hedge funds in the Cayman Islands, owns a real estate company in Canada, and has been in the financial industry since 2004. He is the director of Being Libertarian - Canada and the president of the Libertarian Party of Canada.

Latest posts by Brandon Kirby (see all)

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

2 COMMENTS

  1. I find your argument less than logical but rather than run through and dispute all that i see I would rather recommend a couple of books that would be of great use to you. First of all, read History Of Philosophy by Julian Marias. You will come to see the wisdom of that dictum often cited by philosophers, “Thou shall not try to prove ones thesis by use of multiple systems of philosophy. One does not get to pick and choose one’s proofs.” The second book i would recommend, especially to all libertarians, is “Inventing The Individual, The origins Of Western liberalism” One cannot talk about “freedom” until one has talked about equality, for without equality, freedom has little meaning. One needs a solid foundation, not bits and pieces of random philosophical systems thrown together in the hope that one’s argument sticks.

Comments are closed.