Within the past week, I’ve had a drastic and sudden change of heart regarding my political ideology. For years, I considered myself a Thoreauvian Minarchist, a term I made up to reflect the influence Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau had on my libertarianism. My ideology, until my recent conversion, can be summed up as a melding of the Founding Father’s rationale for the formulation of government, as can be found in The Federalist Papers, with the self-reliance and spirituality of Transcendentalism.
As Emerson and Thoreau would say, I am still “following my own genius,” but it has led me into a new ideological realm: modern progressivism.
First, a little background. In my extended family, my grandparents and most of my aunts and uncles are conservatives, whereas my cousins are mostly liberals. My mother is not very political, but she could be described as right-of-center, and my father is a Reagan Republican. My extended family is quite large, and we would often discuss politics at reunions. I pride myself in understanding and appreciating both left and right sides of an issue, though I typically agreed with the more conservative side; I was more or less a conservative for a long time, but became disillusioned when the size of government never shrunk when the GOP held the reins of government and studied, and then embraced, libertarianism.
However, I am jumping ship yet again. The recent political strife over repealing and replacing Obamacare has enlightened me to a fact heretofore unknown to me. In 2010, I was very much against the imposition of Obamacare, but in recent weeks Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren has warned that if Obamacare is repealed, “people will die.”
I took a few philosophy classes in college, one of which centered on logic. By applying a critical lens to what Warren has claimed, I realized that if Obamacare is not repealed, people will not die. I may be an outlier, but I do not want to die. I eat healthy, exercise regularly, and am risk-adverse to the point of not engaging in any sport or activity that requires a helmet, I don’t attend Scottish soccer matches, and I drive well below the speed limit, often with my four-ways flashing.
There is nothing wrong with changing a position upon the availability of new information. I was very critical of Obamacare upon its passage and implementation, but upon learning that Obamacare is a source of immortality, I am now one of its staunchest supporters.
When I first started seeing all these ads and interviews about people dying, I thought, “I’m pretty sure everyone dies eventually.” Sadly, I’m not as eloquent as one of my favorite writers.
They were seated in the boat, Nick in the stern, his father rowing. The sun was coming up over the hills. A bass jumped, making a circle in the water. Nick trailed his hand in the water. It felt warm in the sharp chill of the morning. In the early morning on the lake sitting in the stern of the boat with his father rowing, he felt quite sure that he would never die, because the Democrats would one day pass Obamacare that would expand Medicaid coverage.
Democrats/liberals/progressives/hippy douchebags, whatever you want to call them, fancy themselves as fighting for the vulnerable. To them, everyone who isn’t part of the 1% are the unwashed masses littering 19th century Parisian streets. They act as though they are champions of the poor and destitute, protecting them from the indifferent landed gentry riding in their horse drawn coaches trampling beggars underfoot. And yes, I will confirm for those of you suspecting, that I just watched Les Misérables, which stars Wolverine, Jor-El, and Catwoman.
Democrats fancy themselves pro-science (jury’s still out on that one), but they are definitely not pro-math, and I daresay they are not pro-reality. They piss and moan that if Trumpcare passes and envelopes Obamacare, proposed Medicaid cuts (which are just reductions in projected annual increases) would lead to poor and middle class Americans dying in the streets.
Forgive me for changing metaphors midstream, but if you desired to keep a vulnerable people afloat, as well as add to their numbers, and were capable of logic, you might try to renovate the ship so it could accommodate more passengers, or design and build a new and improved ship. You wouldn’t put more passengers aboard an already sinking ship, would you?
National Review writers state, “Medicaid is really the low-hanging fruit of the entitlement wars. If Congress can’t reform Medicaid, how can it ever be expected to make changes to Social Security and Medicare, which have wider and more powerful constituencies?” & “Arkansas is taking significant steps toward reversing Obamacare’s devastating impact. Other expansion states should take note.” Mises.org ran an article stating, “Believe it or not, the data suggest that if anything, ObamaCare actually caused more Americans to die” and at the Federalist, “[R]esearch has shown that being on Medicaid produces no better health outcomes than being uninsured.”
And that’s the way it is, as far as you know.
Image: Fox News
Latest posts by Dillon Eliassen (see all)
- Cognitive Dissonance, Continued - February 1, 2020
- The Elizabeth Warren Paradox: “Vote For Me, I Can’t Win!” - January 29, 2020
- A Legitimate Use of Government Power - January 5, 2020