Why Rand Paul Should Have Run As a Libertarian


When Rand Paul announced that he was running for President of the United States, I was overjoyed and moved. I believed in Rand’s message, supported him to the fullest, and even purchased a Rand shirt and Rand mug.

Paul supports freedom, equality, and fairness. He would have been an outstanding nominee for the Libertarian Party and had a better shot of being President, especially with Democrats and Republicans nominating two of the most disliked candidates in history.

The central theme of Paul’s campaign was “small government.” Like a plethora of blue collar, working Americans, this is something I can appreciate. I don’t want big government forcing me to purchase socialistic programs, such as Obamacare or stealing money from my hard-earned paycheck to fund their programs. Republicans and Democrats both support big government in their own ways and Rand Paul, as the Libertarian nominee, would have provided an excellent contrast to the same coin, two party system.

Libertarians frequently struggle with putting forth excellent representation for the party. Trump and Clinton were two of the most unpopular candidates to ever run for office and Libertarians truly missed a shot to present a powerful nominee with the ability to pull support from the traditional “left” and “right.”

Rand is a true believer of libertarian values and principles. He supports gun rights, low taxes, and “defeating the Washington Machine.” Rand is charismatic, innovative, and inspirational. He would have done a superb job at pulling votes from Republicans and Democrats.

I am deeply crestfallen that Libertarians nominated Gary Johnson. He was a fruitless candidate and his running mate, Bill Weld, endorsed Democrat nominee, Hillary Clinton shortly before the election, which truly hurt the credibility of Libertarians. Rand Paul would not have chosen a running mate that supported everything that Libertarians oppose.

It is my sincere hope that the Libertarian Party will pick strong, successful leaders from here on out. Our party’s values are remarkable and will benefit America by restoring power to the people and not the government. Unfortunately, due to the collusion of the two party system to lock out any competition, Libertarians are at a disadvantage. This means we must be diligent and put our best and brightest forward on our quest to victory.

* Gabrielle Seunagal is an 18 year old conservative libertarian. She currently resides in Alpharetta, Georgia and works as a hostess at Café Intermezzo.

This article was edited for grammar, style, and spelling, but not for content. The views expressed are that of the author, Martin van Staden, exclusively, and do not reflect that of BeingLibertarian.com or Being Libertarian LLC

The following two tabs change content below.
Martin van Staden is the Editor-in-Chief of BeingLibertarian.com and a final year LL.B law student at the University of Pretoria in South Africa. He is a co-founder of the Rational Standard (rationalstandard.com) and the Southern African Academic Programs Director at Students For Liberty (studentsforliberty.org).

Latest posts by Martin van Staden (see all)


We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.


©2016 Being Libertaian | Site design by Nerdy Zombie

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?

%d bloggers like this: